Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Old eclasses - candidates for removal?
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 04:52:31
Message-Id: 4A29F601.4020909@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Old eclasses - candidates for removal? by "Petteri Räty"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Petteri Räty wrote:
5 > Ulrich Mueller wrote:
6 ...
7 >> A quick scan shows that the following eclasses were deprecated more
8 >> than three years ago, and are used by no ebuild in the tree:
9 >>
10 >> 2002-05-25 inherit.eclass
11 >> 2003-12-11 kde-i18n.eclass
12 >> 2004-04-16 koffice-i18n.eclass
13 >> 2005-09-18 jakarta-commons.eclass
14 >> 2006-02-28 php.eclass
15 >> 2006-02-28 php-2.eclass
16 >>
17 >> Do we want to remove any of these? Have I missed other candidates?
18 >>
19 >> Ulrich
20 >>
21 >
22 > I would say that we should remove eclasses at earliest two years from
23 > now. The benefit from removing now is near zero and there's some people
24 > lurking around that haven't updated in ages.
25 >
26 > Regards,
27 > Petteri
28
29 Why Petteri?
30
31 The first Portage version that started using the eclasses saved on
32 environment.bz2 was stabled more than 1 year ago and Portage has been
33 saving that info for a lot more than that. Also, as Ulrich pointed out,
34 those eclasses were deprecated *3* years ago.
35 How long are we planning to start to support old installs? Besides, as
36 it has already been pointed out before, all that is required for anyone
37 with such an install to get over the removed eclasses is to grab them
38 from somewhere else and put them under $(portdir)/eclasses - how hard is
39 that?
40 Instead of making us "hold forever" to remove old eclasses, I would
41 rather see us put up a nice page explaining people how to fix any issue
42 that arises from that and with a link to the removed eclasses (a link to
43 the latest version on sources.gentoo.org should be enough).
44
45 - --
46 Regards,
47
48 Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
49 Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE
50 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
51 Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
52 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
53
54 iEYEARECAAYFAkop9gAACgkQcAWygvVEyAIO2wCgiNCdWLYU8s0mt1JWp0WN/hum
55 +EcAnjlwQRVhCEy0ruGwcSAlJJpqoUYv
56 =UpO7
57 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Old eclasses - candidates for removal? "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>