Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrea Barisani <lcars@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reply-to munging
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:11:05
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] reply-to munging by Georgi Georgiev
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 06:06:18PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 14/04/2005-11:01:19(+0200): Andrea Barisani types > > I'm prefectly happy with removing our reply-to header (and leaving > > user_defined one if any) if the userbase of this ml is happy to deal without > > it. > > Are you gonna start a poll on the forums? >
Starting a poll on *forums* about a *ml*, no thanks :). Hope you were being sarcastic. I'm open to suggestions other than the "remove the header and let the flames come" option which unfortunately looks like the only one to me and despite being "right" in many regards I fear it will cause the havoc that we've experienced on gentoo-user. -- Andrea Barisani <lcars@g.o> .*. Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V ( ) GPG-Key 0x864C9B9E ( ) 0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E ^^_^^ "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" -- gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] reply-to munging Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] reply-to munging Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-dev] reply-to munging Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>