| 1 |
Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 05:31:57PM -0400, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> After the 1.4 release, I think it would be a good idea to make |
| 5 |
>> another pass at making db4 the default in gentoo. We're starting |
| 6 |
>> to get packages such as the latest openldap that require db4. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Yep, we definitely need to get db4 ready. I remember that there has |
| 10 |
> been repeated requests to add symbol versioning to db in order to |
| 11 |
> eliminate problems in allowing multiple db versions to co-exist. From |
| 12 |
> an 23 April |
| 13 |
[[ remaining portions trimmed ]] |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
For everyone's reference, the following is a short thread entitled |
| 16 |
"db1/glibc debacle" that describes, in part, a couple of the |
| 17 |
"historical" reasons for our current problems with db4 mirgration: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200208/msg00538.html |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
It may not help us solve the migration problems with db4, but it should |
| 22 |
be an enlightening message for people that are not really familiar with |
| 23 |
(or sympathetic to) the problems surrounding upgrades of this nature. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Cheers, |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Zach Welch |
| 28 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 29 |
Superlucidity Services |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives