| 1 |
On Monday 04 August 2003 18:20, Aron Griffis wrote: |
| 2 |
> Vapier wrote: [Mon Aug 04 2003, 06:15:50PM EDT] |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > anyone have thoughts on how to handle this as intended ? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Use PIPE_STATUS. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I've thought about writing another one like die/assert. It would be |
| 9 |
> assert_pipe, which would require that each element in the pipe returns |
| 10 |
> zero exit status. What do you think? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
please do and i'll make sure it is integrated into portage :) |
| 13 |
right now unpack() is affected by this too ... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> (History: I wrote "die" in the first place.) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
i'll handle your 'reward' off list |
| 18 |
-mike |
Archives