| 1 |
Vapier wrote: [Mon Aug 04 2003, 06:43:49PM EDT] |
| 2 |
> please do and i'll make sure it is integrated into portage :) |
| 3 |
> right now unpack() is affected by this too ... |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Actually, a scan of the portage tree reveals that every case where |
| 6 |
assert is called there is only one element in the pipeline preceding |
| 7 |
(i.e. there is no pipeline). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
This means that it would also be an option to change the behavior of |
| 10 |
assert instead of adding a new API to portage. It wouldn't affect any |
| 11 |
of the ebuilds currently in the tree. I think this would be a better |
| 12 |
option since right now, assert is essentially the same thing as || die. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > (History: I wrote "die" in the first place.) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> i'll handle your 'reward' off list -mike |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
:-) I didn't write that for rewards or self-gratification; I was... |
| 19 |
qualifying my intent to write an additional API. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Aron |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives