| 1 |
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 11:08:21PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mikael Hallendal wrote: [Wed Aug 22 2001, 12:39:04AM EDT] |
| 3 |
> > So this discussion can be postponed until we have this need. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Yup, you're right. It made sense to me at the time, but now we've come |
| 6 |
> full circle and it doesn't any more. :-| |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
But your idea to not forcefully pass MAKEOPTS to submakes is a good one |
| 9 |
and is something that we should probablly do. This tends to cause the |
| 10 |
Linux kernel to for MAKEOPTS * MAKEOPTS gcc processes, from what I recall. |
| 11 |
Maybe removing this as you suggest will fix it. If you want to modify |
| 12 |
emake on cvs (/usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/files/1.5/bin/emake) go ahead |
| 13 |
and do so, and let me know when you have. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Best Regards, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
| 19 |
Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org |
| 20 |
Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |
Archives