1 |
Daniel Robbins wrote: [Wed Aug 22 2001, 02:05:35AM EDT] |
2 |
> But your idea to not forcefully pass MAKEOPTS to submakes is a good one |
3 |
> and is something that we should probablly do. This tends to cause the |
4 |
> Linux kernel to for MAKEOPTS * MAKEOPTS gcc processes, from what I recall. |
5 |
> Maybe removing this as you suggest will fix it. If you want to modify |
6 |
> emake on cvs (/usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/files/1.5/bin/emake) go ahead |
7 |
> and do so, and let me know when you have. |
8 |
|
9 |
Sure, I'll do that. |
10 |
|
11 |
Aron |