1 |
On 1/16/16 8:03 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
2 |
> On 1/16/16 7:54 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote: |
3 |
>> On 01/16/2016 19:41, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
4 |
>>> Hi everyone, |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> I emailed Julian earlier today and asked him to come back. He state in |
7 |
>>> no uncertain terms that he does not intend on coming back. |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> Julian and I were working on the libressl project together. He was |
10 |
>>> doing the lion share and I contributed here and there for packages that |
11 |
>>> I was interested in. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> I just don't have time to push that project through on my own. Mostly |
14 |
>>> what needs to be done is the migration to the tree as described on the |
15 |
>>> following page: |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> https://github.com/gentoo/libressl/wiki/Transition-plan |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> I'd like to solicit help in pushing this through. Any takers? |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> Is the plan to just make packages in the tree compatible with libressl so that |
22 |
>> users can choose either one, or to migrate off of openssl entirely? |
23 |
>> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> The plan is basically this ... |
26 |
> |
27 |
> IUSE="libressl ssl" |
28 |
> |
29 |
> RDEPEND=" |
30 |
> ssl? ( |
31 |
> !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) |
32 |
> libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl ) |
33 |
> ) |
34 |
> " |
35 |
> |
36 |
> You choose either libressl or openssl and you build the entire tree with |
37 |
> that. |
38 |
> |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
Actually, if people take care of their own packages, that would really |
42 |
speed things up. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
46 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
47 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
48 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
49 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |