| 1 |
Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Wed Jun 23 2004, 06:53:01AM EDT] |
| 2 |
> I think that before this all, we first and all need to get absolutely clear |
| 3 |
> what we want to do with these keywords. As a package maintainer I know that |
| 4 |
> it can sometimes be displeasing when other archs mark your package as stable. |
| 5 |
> I do however not think that we need to spend that much effort on the problem. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> If we want to spend the effort we however should first make clear the purpose, |
| 8 |
> not just make clear what the arch maintainer's keyword is without making it |
| 9 |
> clear what is the purpose of this knowledge. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Right now I am going to bed, but I will make sure to include an |
| 12 |
explanation of the goal and rationale for change in my next round-up, |
| 13 |
which I will send out tomorrow. Thanks, I didn't mean to be pursuing |
| 14 |
something that wasn't clear to everybody. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Aron |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Aron Griffis |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives