| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 02/24/2013 10:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> I think that base.eclass is silently intended for removal at some |
| 6 |
> point in the future. While we're here, we should probably mark it |
| 7 |
> deprecated. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The problem with deprecating base.eclass and telling people to use |
| 11 |
autotools-utils.eclass instead is that base.eclass also defines a |
| 12 |
src_prepare that is used for eclasses that support *non*-autotools |
| 13 |
build systems, such as cmake-utils.eclass. Requiring that support to |
| 14 |
be copied around to each of the eclasses that currently inherits base |
| 15 |
would allow the usual issues with copying code around. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- -- |
| 18 |
Jonathan Callen (abcd) |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 21 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRKlZ+AAoJELHSF2kinlg4L0UP/24ETiIoXIVS9it65p2s/YER |
| 24 |
D/KCcgsbTMowWTrs488mQ8Vs/3T0Ij2sDuYRcOqqKEiDb6+aAeILhU3pDP9c8k7V |
| 25 |
L8jV1RpF2nafO4dexXU9FBMd6KYvz3Vsf4JQfiHzybdBsVW9HE0vrU/lrST91tm8 |
| 26 |
irDxPfOWFMPGM3r8YD+AuQ6DlkgaMdnJnT+c9Bu5xtoGrjZ5inmSCeskQkX9zP54 |
| 27 |
wFFuwyg3+Db08r+qTHkUqnAPc1t3fSsz7X4tgQfX5btBjVgDKKYm2dsScjNmhvxg |
| 28 |
4Wnv+A5R4QAcce3CWUOp/BXTAg6PuYBbGWZWm+5WzQstsZRRo+hiGh7buyIctdix |
| 29 |
IRQaoNh7SRMiiV2STHJtjqz8+e28NsK16Na4PSbDM3GOYbiq+gb8dyDpvIQpzN6m |
| 30 |
48G2dhETJpAvox6YnA6Ix9YDdoAl0Y25ynJSUajLbyQ9+rSiynIGnMT5UHFr9zaM |
| 31 |
2zs9oXRaqO7Gj1A98nN0NwjC0U+sP7J2JidvcXbUO7YNx4exsgzUHdbrdG7gBpVd |
| 32 |
iPHpECyrgh3uqIRS0j3bCR6WQAOBGb708hXrNj5a/ldGvYTYlLmt2Tbq+mJapZmp |
| 33 |
uFLYrK1kwBmXj/3CSErO0Bg0lMspk8E0MnEljChdFPGYekkbPGhZKGp9EufczG+G |
| 34 |
C5L3dv7V1Nv2AyyFiYB3 |
| 35 |
=cyEa |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives