| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:04:21PM -0500, Jason Waldhelm wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 11 August 2004 06:55 pm, Maurice van der Pot wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:41:47PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I merely closed it out, with a notice that we couldn't do anything about |
| 5 |
> > > it. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > So now it will no longer show up if somebody does a simple search in |
| 8 |
> > bugzilla. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> i searched using 'ALL 2.6.8-rc4' (using ALL as the example suggests) and your |
| 11 |
> bug is the only one that comes up. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Maybe I'm alone in this, but in general I do not want to see bugs that have |
| 14 |
been marked RESOLVED. If I do ALL nfs (it is a problem with nfs), then I get |
| 15 |
83 hits. 18 of those are still open (and returned by just searching for nfs) |
| 16 |
and 19 of those (18 open + mine) are still relevant. As the bug database |
| 17 |
grows, this will become even more of a pain (think glibc, gcc, portage, ...) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Maurice. |
Archives