| 1 |
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 7:21 PM Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> It had 3 states however: |
| 4 |
> a) go ahead and touch it, no additional approvals needed |
| 5 |
> b) please get a maintainer to approve it |
| 6 |
> c) do not touch it |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
++ |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Though to be fair b is really no different from what just about |
| 12 |
anybody can do via a pull request. I don't think most maintainers are |
| 13 |
going to be hovering between a vs c. I suspect most are going to be |
| 14 |
divided between a vs b. I guess I could see an argument for c if some |
| 15 |
package is really finicky and tends to get a lot of repetitive |
| 16 |
requests for changes that won't work for reasons that might not be |
| 17 |
obvious, but I'm not sure if that is really a concern. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives