| 1 |
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 20:54 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 28 June 2004 20:43, foser wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 19:32 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > exif |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Exif support was quite some time ago decided to be switched by the jpeg |
| 7 |
> > flag. That's how exif support currently in the tree is handled. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I didn't know about that. exif and jpeg are separate configuration options in |
| 10 |
> PHP. I'd prefer to leave them both available for now. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
They are in most (all?) cases, although exif without jpeg is usually not |
| 13 |
possible because of how these formats are intertwined. That is why there |
| 14 |
was a deliberate choice to make no disctinction. Questionable in itself, |
| 15 |
having several interpretations living in the tree is worse and I'd |
| 16 |
strongly suggest against that. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
- foser |
Archives