1 |
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 07:59 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > as avenj pointed out, current 'mission statement' of devrel says that |
4 |
> > they handle the issue of actually revoking a dev's access |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I thought this was written somewhere too, but I can't seem to find it |
7 |
> anywhere. Do you know where it says this? |
8 |
|
9 |
main project page for devrel |
10 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/index.xml |
11 |
|
12 |
> It certainly says they're responsible for adding and removing |
13 |
> developers, but I don't see anything about them being solely responsible |
14 |
> for revoking access. |
15 |
|
16 |
no, nowhere does it say 'devrel is the only team which may revoke access', but |
17 |
it is the only team which says they can and i'd prefer it stay that way |
18 |
-mike |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |