| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>It certainly says they're responsible for adding and removing |
| 4 |
>>developers, but I don't see anything about them being solely responsible |
| 5 |
>>for revoking access. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> no, nowhere does it say 'devrel is the only team which may revoke access', but |
| 9 |
> it is the only team which says they can and i'd prefer it stay that way |
| 10 |
> -mike |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I would like there to be a clause that infra has the ability to at least |
| 13 |
temporarily revoke access to have the ability to protect our servers if |
| 14 |
something came up quickly. I've always made sure any permanent removals |
| 15 |
go through devrel first. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
| 19 |
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
--- |
| 22 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
| 23 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |
Archives