| 1 |
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 08:22 pm, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> >>It certainly says they're responsible for adding and removing |
| 4 |
> >>developers, but I don't see anything about them being solely responsible |
| 5 |
> >>for revoking access. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > no, nowhere does it say 'devrel is the only team which may revoke |
| 8 |
> > access', but it is the only team which says they can and i'd prefer it |
| 9 |
> > stay that way |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I would like there to be a clause that infra has the ability to at least |
| 12 |
> temporarily revoke access to have the ability to protect our servers if |
| 13 |
> something came up quickly. I've always made sure any permanent removals |
| 14 |
> go through devrel first. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
that would make a lot of sense |
| 17 |
-mike |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives