| 1 |
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 23:40, Stewart Honsberger wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello all; |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I've just marked ProFTPD 1.2.9 stable which fixes things like memory |
| 5 |
> leaks, segfaults, config file shennanigans and a security bug or two |
| 6 |
> (update!!! :) ) and barring any problems plan on removing the stagnant |
| 7 |
> ebuilds and their spaghettiwork of patches from the tree (starting with |
| 8 |
> the 1.2.9 release candidates). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> A couple of questions before I do so; |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> How many people are still using 1.2.5? Should that ebuild remain, or |
| 13 |
> should I remove all but 1.2.7-9? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Wasn't there a security issue for ProFTPd anyway? I thought I saw one |
| 16 |
arrive to security@gentoo recently on the bug tracker. Anyway, if |
| 17 |
whatever version was in there for a month with no bug reports against |
| 18 |
it, move it to stable and clean out the old ones. |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Seemant Kulleen |
| 21 |
Developer and Project Co-ordinator, |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E |
| 25 |
Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E |
Archives