1 |
Stewart, |
2 |
While your in there cleaning house could you please |
3 |
change the export LDFLAGS="-lresolv" to append-ldflags -lresolv |
4 |
|
5 |
On Sat, 2004-01-24 at 03:42, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
6 |
> On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 23:40, Stewart Honsberger wrote: |
7 |
> > Hello all; |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > I've just marked ProFTPD 1.2.9 stable which fixes things like memory |
10 |
> > leaks, segfaults, config file shennanigans and a security bug or two |
11 |
> > (update!!! :) ) and barring any problems plan on removing the stagnant |
12 |
> > ebuilds and their spaghettiwork of patches from the tree (starting with |
13 |
> > the 1.2.9 release candidates). |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > A couple of questions before I do so; |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > How many people are still using 1.2.5? Should that ebuild remain, or |
18 |
> > should I remove all but 1.2.7-9? |
19 |
|
20 |
Please flush them all. |
21 |
|
22 |
> |
23 |
> Wasn't there a security issue for ProFTPd anyway? I thought I saw one |
24 |
> arrive to security@gentoo recently on the bug tracker. Anyway, if |
25 |
> whatever version was in there for a month with no bug reports against |
26 |
> it, move it to stable and clean out the old ones. |
27 |
|
28 |
proftpd-1.2.9_rc2 was the stable version that fixes the known security |
29 |
problems it was marked stable back in Oct I think. |
30 |
|
31 |
If new security problems have surfaced then security@g.o should be made |
32 |
aware. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
36 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |