Archives
Archives
| From: | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex-cvs being removed from portage? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:08:37 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20030725160834.62e6617d.degrenier@easyconnect.fr | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex-cvs being removed from portage? by Chris Gianelloni |
||
| 1 | On 24 Jul 2003 22:01:37 -0400 |
| 2 | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Here's a basic summary from the way I see it from watching the |
| 5 | > discussion. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 21:42, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: |
| 8 | > > If there are other reasons can we know them and maybe |
| 9 | > > comment on them, too? |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > How about because they asked us to? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | And we are not the first ones. It reminds a similar case for Debian: |
| 14 | http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200205/msg02463.html |
| 15 | which has brought to this conclusion: |
| 16 | http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200205/msg02823.html |
| 17 | |
| 18 | I've thought it was some interesting reading about this subject. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | -- |
| 21 | TGL. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | -- |
| 24 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |