| 1 |
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 2 |
> How do you plan to handle the following: |
| 3 |
> - foo installs an udev rule |
| 4 |
> - install foo with old udev |
| 5 |
> - upgrade udev |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> are rules installed by foo used by new udev ? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
No, they wouldn't be; that is a good reason to question the value of the |
| 10 |
eclass itself. Maybe the correct way to do this is to forget the eclass |
| 11 |
and just file bugs against packages that break having them move their |
| 12 |
rules to the new location and set a dependency on the newer udev. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This would have to be a rev bump for the broken packages. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
William |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> A. |
| 20 |
> |
Archives