| 1 |
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:11:42 -0500 |
| 2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> All, |
| 5 |
> I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move everything |
| 6 |
> currently in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> For packages that install udev rules in ${FILESDIR}, we need an eclass |
| 9 |
> that tests the version of udev installed on the user's system and |
| 10 |
> installs the udev rules in the proper place. I'm not sure how many |
| 11 |
> packages do this, so if it is a very small number of packages, it may |
| 12 |
> not be worth the eclass. It would be good to discuss that as well as |
| 13 |
> reviewing the proposed eclass. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
How do you plan to handle the following: |
| 16 |
- foo installs an udev rule |
| 17 |
- install foo with old udev |
| 18 |
- upgrade udev |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
are rules installed by foo used by new udev ? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
A. |
Archives