Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Peer-to-Peer?
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:39:38
Message-Id: 20020718133920.GB8468@datanode.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Peer-to-Peer? by Yannick Koehler
1 then we could rename all the extensions to rpm and...
2
3 sorry, not trying to be callous, but one flaw I would see is that there
4 is more to the flags than just the hardware flag. I have three machines
5 running gentoo, each of them with hardware in various states of
6 degredation. What you suggest would also require, in addition to a
7 package per hardware config, is one per possible config line (USE
8 variables can differ from user to user depending on their needs - i have
9 a box with a USE of -X -java -qt -gnome -kde -gtk just to insure that
10 nothing got put on that might have a dependancy on those), not to
11 mention dependancies (F begot G which begot H which begot I). For
12 instance, as time has progressed I have noticed that emerge -pu world
13 displays some packages marked as N, which means that new dependancies
14 have arisen since I fist installed the package in question.
15
16 But then, that would just be my meager $.02 worth, which these days
17 won't even cover taxes on a soda can. Cool idea though for using
18 distributed package sources...would require that every peer keep up to
19 date tarballs though, to account for security fixes and patches, might
20 be a little bandwith intensive...but i ramble.
21
22 On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:26:38AM -0400, Yannick Koehler wrote:
23 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
24 > Hash: SHA1
25 >
26 >
27 > I read about bittorrent recently. I was wondering if the mirror and tools
28 > used by gentoo (fetch/wget) support such system. If so, wouldn't be great
29 > that people like me who could participate in providing packages could install
30 > bittorrent or another file sharing peer-to-peer tools and help in spreading
31 > gentoo ;-)
32 >
33 > I see two kind of packages distribution, the source one
34 > (/usr/portage/distfiles/*) and the compiled package. Someone could setup on
35 > the mirror a binary version of gentoo compile with specific use/compile flags
36 > (preferrably the default one set inside the various gentoo config files) and
37 > then people that like that configuration could just install those package
38 > instead of re-compiling, they could still recompile the package that they
39 > want with their own option but for may speed up a lot upgrade of package for
40 > end-user satisfied with the pre-compile cflags/use of the mirror.
41 >
42 > There could also be more than one mirror with different flags/use. It would
43 > even be nice that the mirror only reflect content of package held on end-user
44 > system for the peer-to-peer system to kick in and offer them to other users.
45 >
46 > - --
47 >
48 > Yannick Koehler
49 >
50 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
51 > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
52 > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
53 >
54 > iD8DBQE9NsIQfuKOJNEyL1URAijgAJ4wbPpcwcvXr+BgU24OWMV4UyvNSgCeMeLq
55 > OMaHi86uiQF2c9XO2GkOduQ=
56 > =wlCx
57 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
58 >
59 > _______________________________________________
60 > gentoo-dev mailing list
61 > gentoo-dev@g.o
62 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Peer-to-Peer? Michael Cummings <mcummings@××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Peer-to-Peer? Yannick Koehler <yannick.koehler@××××××××.com>