1 |
I just wanted to repeat, I meant absolutely no offense or disrespect |
2 |
with this posting, turn the flame guns off, yada yada yada. I think the |
3 |
"technology"/technique posted about is interesting, could be useful, |
4 |
just IMHO binaries for the gentoo packages goes against why something |
5 |
like gentoo is so great... |
6 |
|
7 |
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:39:20AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: |
8 |
> then we could rename all the extensions to rpm and... |
9 |
> |
10 |
> sorry, not trying to be callous, but one flaw I would see is that there |
11 |
> is more to the flags than just the hardware flag. I have three machines |
12 |
> running gentoo, each of them with hardware in various states of |
13 |
> degredation. What you suggest would also require, in addition to a |
14 |
> package per hardware config, is one per possible config line (USE |
15 |
> variables can differ from user to user depending on their needs - i have |
16 |
> a box with a USE of -X -java -qt -gnome -kde -gtk just to insure that |
17 |
> nothing got put on that might have a dependancy on those), not to |
18 |
> mention dependancies (F begot G which begot H which begot I). For |
19 |
> instance, as time has progressed I have noticed that emerge -pu world |
20 |
> displays some packages marked as N, which means that new dependancies |
21 |
> have arisen since I fist installed the package in question. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> But then, that would just be my meager $.02 worth, which these days |
24 |
> won't even cover taxes on a soda can. Cool idea though for using |
25 |
> distributed package sources...would require that every peer keep up to |
26 |
> date tarballs though, to account for security fixes and patches, might |
27 |
> be a little bandwith intensive...but i ramble. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:26:38AM -0400, Yannick Koehler wrote: |
30 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
31 |
> > Hash: SHA1 |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > I read about bittorrent recently. I was wondering if the mirror and tools |
35 |
> > used by gentoo (fetch/wget) support such system. If so, wouldn't be great |
36 |
> > that people like me who could participate in providing packages could install |
37 |
> > bittorrent or another file sharing peer-to-peer tools and help in spreading |
38 |
> > gentoo ;-) |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > I see two kind of packages distribution, the source one |
41 |
> > (/usr/portage/distfiles/*) and the compiled package. Someone could setup on |
42 |
> > the mirror a binary version of gentoo compile with specific use/compile flags |
43 |
> > (preferrably the default one set inside the various gentoo config files) and |
44 |
> > then people that like that configuration could just install those package |
45 |
> > instead of re-compiling, they could still recompile the package that they |
46 |
> > want with their own option but for may speed up a lot upgrade of package for |
47 |
> > end-user satisfied with the pre-compile cflags/use of the mirror. |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> > There could also be more than one mirror with different flags/use. It would |
50 |
> > even be nice that the mirror only reflect content of package held on end-user |
51 |
> > system for the peer-to-peer system to kick in and offer them to other users. |
52 |
> > |
53 |
> > - -- |
54 |
> > |
55 |
> > Yannick Koehler |
56 |
> > |
57 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
58 |
> > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) |
59 |
> > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org |
60 |
> > |
61 |
> > iD8DBQE9NsIQfuKOJNEyL1URAijgAJ4wbPpcwcvXr+BgU24OWMV4UyvNSgCeMeLq |
62 |
> > OMaHi86uiQF2c9XO2GkOduQ= |
63 |
> > =wlCx |
64 |
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
65 |
> > |
66 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
67 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
68 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
69 |
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
70 |
> _______________________________________________ |
71 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
72 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
73 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |