Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 12:02:37
Message-Id: 20150608140154.4a3c3bc7@pomiot.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages by hasufell
1 Dnia 2015-06-08, o godz. 12:46:42
2 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> napisał(a):
3
4 > On 06/07/2015 05:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
5 > > Hello, developers.
6 > >
7 > [...]
8 >
9 > It's not clear to me how the transition should look like.
10 >
11 > Are you suggesting Ninja to be the new default or do you want to switch
12 > per-packages after having tested them?
13 >
14 > If the former, then we need a tinderbox-run.
15
16 The latter. We don't have the resources to do the former properly,
17 and the number of packages relying on GNU make is too large. Some
18 ebuilds will also need more extensive changes.
19
20 --
21 Best regards,
22 Michał Górny

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages hasufell <hasufell@g.o>