Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules | ||
| Date: | Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:07:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_=n4uiOxx20EY4cYVY7qaQ5tq6m1+V-VVGETSJwCwJ0EA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules by Patrick Lauer |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > I think it's safe to deprecate the antepenultimate EAPI, and then do the |
| 3 | > banning on a more delayed and controlled basis. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Yeah, I don't think we need to overly debate deprecation, other than |
| 6 | in corner cases like the toolchain (just that minor thing...). |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I guess to turn things around, does anybody strongly object to the |
| 9 | council banning an EAPI or two? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Rich |