Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
To: Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 14:04:59
Message-Id: 200310041404.56692.luke-jr@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree by Stuart Herbert
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Saturday 04 October 2003 01:51 pm, Stuart Herbert wrote:
5 > On Saturday 04 October 2003 2:10 pm, Luke-Jr wrote:
6 > > You could always 'emerge linux-src' if Portage were to add the -src
7 > > suffix as I described.
8 >
9 > And what would that give me? The current range of sources in Portage gives
10 > me a nice selection of choice. Personally, I'm very happy with it.
11 emerge linux-mm-src, then. or emerge linux-redhat-src, if you prefer.
12 >
13 > > I don't think it should modify the configurations, only a few symlinks
14 > > that you can ignore if you choose to.
15 >
16 > No thanks.
17 Just because you choose not to use it doesn't mean you should be forcing other
18 people not to be able to. This provides the *option* to use it. Options are
19 always best.
20 >
21 > > If you'd be compiling the kernel for another system, you could have
22 > > Portage build only a GRP. As for local dependencies, the
23 > > development-sources already depend on the module-init-tools needed to run
24 > > them even though the sources don't actually need it.
25 >
26 > And what about kernel modules that are required? How will those get
27 > re-compiled? You can't just re-emerge them, because they have this
28 > annoying habit of going and deleting the currently-installed version ...
29 That annoying habit is what should be fixed, then. Using a bug as a reason to
30 not implement a feature isn't a good idea... =p
31 >
32 > > It might also be worth noting that often
33 > > the time between a system update and etc-update, your system could in
34 > > theory be unbootable were there to be a power failure.
35 >
36 > I'm sorry, but I really do think that this idea is both stupid, and more
37 > trouble than it's worth. Administrators have been managing their boxes
38 > just fine up to now.
39 For the most part, what I am suggesting is adding options, not removing them.
40 Where people used vanilla-sources in the past (which is quite vague actually;
41 why should one assume -sources means it's Linux?), they would now simply be
42 using linux-src. redhat-sources would be linux-redhat-src. Users who don't
43 care to manually recompile their kernels could move over to using linux or
44 linux-redhat. It would also let people emerge things such as kdelibs-src or
45 apache-src if they wanted to.
46 - --
47 Luke-Jr
48 Developer, Gentoo Linux
49 http://www.gentoo.org/
50 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
51 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
52
53 iD8DBQE/ftODZl/BHdU+lYMRAro3AJ4qKFmVGfl8RI959sPi4oscZlodmACgit99
54 HfUTOcVhd2wq+fEssNKV9AA=
55 =60BZ
56 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
57
58
59 --
60 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>