| 1 |
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:10:58 -0400 |
| 2 |
Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 21:02 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Which is why it's policy that you check every dependent before |
| 5 |
> > making changes to a package. You *do* follow that policy, and not |
| 6 |
> > just assume that repoman passing means it's fine, right? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Excellent. So we are finally in agreement that one *already* needs to |
| 9 |
> check every dependent before making changes to a package - in other |
| 10 |
> words, that implementing my LINGUAS proposal would not change that |
| 11 |
> part of the required workflow for an ebuild maintainer. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It would, though, because ebuilds exist in VDB and in overlays too. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives