| 1 |
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 21:02 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Which is why it's policy that you check every dependent before making |
| 3 |
> changes to a package. You *do* follow that policy, and not just assume |
| 4 |
> that repoman passing means it's fine, right? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Excellent. So we are finally in agreement that one *already* needs to |
| 7 |
check every dependent before making changes to a package - in other |
| 8 |
words, that implementing my LINGUAS proposal would not change that part |
| 9 |
of the required workflow for an ebuild maintainer. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It's good to see us finally agree on something :) |
Archives