| 1 |
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 09:52 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:46:23 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> | On Wednesday 17 August 2005 08:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> | > GLEP 31 is withdrawn until Gentoo gets some means of removing commit |
| 7 |
> | > access from people who say "nyah nyah I don't feel like following |
| 8 |
> | > the rules and so I'll just carry on breaking stuff as I see fit". |
| 9 |
> | > As it stands I've been told by various people that they have no |
| 10 |
> | > interest in ensuring that their commits are UTF-8 safe (even if |
| 11 |
> | > there's an automated check that warns them when they're about to |
| 12 |
> | > break something), and I don't consider it fair to force lots of |
| 13 |
> | > repoman warnings upon other developers who *do* care about that |
| 14 |
> | > kind of thing who just happen to be the next person to touch a |
| 15 |
> | > package that got broken. |
| 16 |
> | |
| 17 |
> | Repoman could check the commit message for being valid UTF-8 and |
| 18 |
> | simply not allow the commit if it isn't. :) |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Well, I have a tool already that checks that. But it doesn't help when |
| 21 |
> we have developers who don't use repoman, who forcibly override repoman |
| 22 |
> fatal errors and who just randomly remove anything they think is |
| 23 |
> causing errors... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
yes, but lets work with what we have ... besides, it'll be easy to pick out |
| 26 |
who used repoman and who didnt by checking who has broken UTF8 commit |
| 27 |
messages ;) |
| 28 |
-mike |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives