1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
I like your (Alex) new proposal, but I have the following annotations: |
4 |
|
5 |
> As of sys-fs/udev-210, the options CONFIG_FHANDLE and CONFIG_NET |
6 |
> are now required in the kernel. A warning will be issued if they |
7 |
> are missing when you upgrade. See the package's README in |
8 |
> /usr/share/doc/udev-210/ for more optional kernel options. |
9 |
|
10 |
Isn't that a chicken/egg problem? I see the NEWS when I have |
11 |
<sys-fs/udev-210 installed. The NEWS tells me to read the README in |
12 |
"/usr/share/doc/udev-210/" for more options. But until I upgraded I |
13 |
cannot access the README.. |
14 |
|
15 |
So if these options are important, make them available in the Wiki or |
16 |
somewhere else and link to that resource. |
17 |
|
18 |
If these options are not important, remove the sentences because it |
19 |
doesn't add any usable information to that NEWS item. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
> Overriding the 80-net-name-slot.rules in /etc/udev/rules.d/ no |
23 |
> longer works since upstream renamed the file to |
24 |
> /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules. |
25 |
|
26 |
All I have to do is changing the name from "80-net-name-slot.rules" to |
27 |
"80-net-setup-link.rules", e.g. adjusting the name because upstream |
28 |
renamed... not? So a text like |
29 |
|
30 |
The most reliable way of disabling the new network interface |
31 |
scheme is still the kernel parameter "net.ifnames=0". If you are |
32 |
using the "net-name-slot.rules" approach make sure you adapt |
33 |
the new naming before you restart because upstream renamed the |
34 |
"80-net-name-slot.rules" to "80-net-setup-link.rules". |
35 |
|
36 |
sounds better for me instead of saying "overriding no longer works" |
37 |
and to clarify later that this is still possible ;) |
38 |
|
39 |
I don't see a need for mentioning that the actual configuration is |
40 |
located in "/lib/systemd/network/..." in the NEWS item. |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-Thomas |