1 |
Hi! |
2 |
|
3 |
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015, Alec Warner wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Tobias Klausmann <klausman@g.o> |
6 |
> wrote: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> > tl;dr: Continuous Integration is a neat idea if you have the |
9 |
> > Hardware. The off-mainstream arch teams don't. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Clearly because we cannot be perfect, we should not even try! |
12 |
> Realistically aside from the major arches none of the other arches have |
13 |
> large userbases. I think quality for the sake of quality is pretty silly; |
14 |
> but if we can improve the quality of arches where hardware is readily |
15 |
> available we should do so (regardless of minority architecture objections.) |
16 |
|
17 |
Read what I wrote further down. I explicitly point out that amd64 |
18 |
is welcome to do whatever they want regarding CI, but that I |
19 |
suspect that the rift between it and the "lesser" architectures |
20 |
will become wider. |
21 |
|
22 |
Regards, |
23 |
Tobias |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Sent from aboard the Culture ship |
27 |
GSV (System Class) Empiricist |