| 1 |
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 10:09 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:52:37 +0000 (UTC) "Duncan" |
| 3 |
> <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | But as Stuart Herbert pointed out, a project can be self-authorized, |
| 5 |
> | by the current rules. Project Sunrise therefore didn't /need/ |
| 6 |
> | permission to come into existence and set up its own overlay. The |
| 7 |
> | announcement here, while perhaps it /should/ have been discussed as a |
| 8 |
> | proposal first, therefore didn't break the rules as they are now. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The rules call for a GLEP for any wide ranging change. And funnily |
| 11 |
> enough, they do so to avoid exactly the kind of mess that Sunrise is. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Amen. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
This is *exactly* what the GLEP process was created to prevent. This |
| 16 |
project has the potential to impact almost every team in Gentoo. I'd |
| 17 |
call that a wide-ranging change. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 21 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 22 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 23 |
Games - Developer |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives