Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. | ||
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:13:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20060614100903.310fae14@snowdrop.home | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:52:37 +0000 (UTC) "Duncan" |
| 2 | <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 | | But as Stuart Herbert pointed out, a project can be self-authorized, |
| 4 | | by the current rules. Project Sunrise therefore didn't /need/ |
| 5 | | permission to come into existence and set up its own overlay. The |
| 6 | | announcement here, while perhaps it /should/ have been discussed as a |
| 7 | | proposal first, therefore didn't break the rules as they are now. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | The rules call for a GLEP for any wide ranging change. And funnily |
| 10 | enough, they do so to avoid exactly the kind of mess that Sunrise is. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| 14 | Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |