| 1 |
Nicholas Jones posted <20040927220933.GA14289@××××××.net>, excerpted |
| 2 |
below, on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:09:33 -0400: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
>>> Users can affect portage via /etc/portage/virtuals, but it is |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> Shouldn't that be /etc/portage/profile/virtuals? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Seeing as how there is overlap there may be some changes |
| 9 |
> coming to a couple files in /etc/portage. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Support locations in 2.0.51 currently are: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> /etc/portage: |
| 14 |
> package.keywords |
| 15 |
> package.mask |
| 16 |
> package.unmask |
| 17 |
> package.use |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> /etc/portage/profile: |
| 20 |
> make.globals |
| 21 |
> make.defaults |
| 22 |
> package.mask |
| 23 |
> package.provided |
| 24 |
> packages |
| 25 |
> use.mask |
| 26 |
> use.defaults |
| 27 |
> virtuals |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Thanks. Nice, concise, clearly defined, and authoritative. Just what I |
| 30 |
was asking for. I'll be watching for the warned changes, too. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 34 |
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little |
| 35 |
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- |
| 36 |
Benjamin Franklin |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives