Archives
Archives
| From: | Nicholas Jones <carpaski@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] /etc/portage clarification | ||
| Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:09:58 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040927220933.GA14289@twobit.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] 2004.3 - Portage snapshot by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | >> Users can affect portage via /etc/portage/virtuals, but it is |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Shouldn't that be /etc/portage/profile/virtuals? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Seeing as how there is overlap there may be some changes |
| 6 | coming to a couple files in /etc/portage. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Support locations in 2.0.51 currently are: |
| 9 | |
| 10 | /etc/portage: |
| 11 | package.keywords |
| 12 | package.mask |
| 13 | package.unmask |
| 14 | package.use |
| 15 | |
| 16 | /etc/portage/profile: |
| 17 | make.globals |
| 18 | make.defaults |
| 19 | package.mask |
| 20 | package.provided |
| 21 | packages |
| 22 | use.mask |
| 23 | use.defaults |
| 24 | virtuals |
| 25 | |
| 26 | --NJ |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: /etc/portage clarification | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |