1 |
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:48:07PM -0600, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
2 |
: On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 10:27:37AM +0000, Thomas Beaudry wrote: |
3 |
: > If you're still looking for a supervise replacement, I just stumbled over |
4 |
: > this: |
5 |
: > |
6 |
: > http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/ |
7 |
: |
8 |
: >From reading the README file on the Monit Web site, it looks like Monit does |
9 |
: everything we would need and also would be easy to integrate into the system. |
10 |
: Jerry, Grant: could you look into monit as you have time and see if it you can |
11 |
: find any deficiencies? Otherwise, this looks like a great solution. And it |
12 |
: seems a lot less invasive than daemontools. |
13 |
: |
14 |
: Thanks for the link, Thomas! :) |
15 |
|
16 |
I looked at it briefly. I agree that this is the best of the solutions |
17 |
that I've been exploring. I'm gonna try to wrap up the mail stuff and |
18 |
work more in-depth on this in the upcoming week. |
19 |
|
20 |
--Jerry |
21 |
|
22 |
name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a |
23 |
phone: 703.599.6023 || matter of life or death... |
24 |
email: jerry@×××××××.org || ...It's much more important |
25 |
|| than that! |