| 1 |
Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ok, since the first time around apparently wasn't good enough, how about |
| 3 |
> this? This project sucks. It takes random ebuilds without enough merit |
| 4 |
> or demand to even have some team and/or developer within Gentoo pick it |
| 5 |
> up, and dumps it to a |
| 6 |
> user-supported-yet-completely-official-break-my-gentoo-style tree that |
| 7 |
> has to potential to cause all sorts of QA problems. It flies right in |
| 8 |
> the face of those of us that have strived to educate users not to rice |
| 9 |
> out their systems with outside-the-tree ebuilds that have not gone |
| 10 |
> through some sort of arch team and/or maintainer QA before hitting the |
| 11 |
> tree. There is nothing you or anyone else can say that will make me |
| 12 |
> think otherwise, and I think it needs to be killed. Now. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I try to stay out of these types of things, but I have to say that I agree |
| 15 |
completely. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives