Archives
Archives
| From: | Daniel Buschke <magic-gentoo@××××××××××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] speeding up usage of portage in e-file / portage file list | ||
| Date: | Sat, 23 May 2020 21:17:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | 83b58960-4ecb-03f7-c6ae-841ebf1d5ada@damage.devloop.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] speeding up usage of portage in e-file / portage file list by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | Am 23.05.2020 um 22:55 schrieb Zac Medico: |
| 2 | > Since the portage API only added about 1 second to the python script |
| 3 | > time, I guess it's on par with your bash implementation. ;-P |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Yeah, if you substract the second for loading and the second for doing |
| 6 | queries, then yes, it's pretty par with the bash implementation :D |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Let me answer this with a meme ;) |
| 9 | https://damage.devloop.de/zac_makes_runtime_equal.jpg |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Thanks |
| 12 | Daniel |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] speeding up usage of portage in e-file / portage file list | Daniel Pielmeier <billie@g.o> |
