Archives
Archives
| From: | "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die | ||
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:00:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200507291558.02120@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die by Dan Armak |
||
| 1 | On Friday 29 July 2005 15:56, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 2 | > base.eclass (which inherited by many other eclasses) has an src_unpack |
| 3 | > supporting patching from patchfiles listed in $PATCHES. However, today, if |
| 4 | > patching fails the process doesn't abort. |
| 5 | Why can't we just use epatch? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | -- |
| 8 | Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
| 9 | Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
| 10 | (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die | Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> |