Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 11 | ||
| Date: | Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:44:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090610234403.58bc6587@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 11 by Tobias Scherbaum |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:37:33 +0200 |
| 2 | Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Putting in a wait for 4 or 8 weeks or whatever doesn't cost us |
| 4 | > anything but does simplify things and gives us a clear deployment |
| 5 | > process. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | It loses us reasonably wide testing of Portage's implementation in |
| 8 | ~arch. I'd rather not see Portage go stable with an EAPI before that |
| 9 | EAPI's been tested in the main tree for packages that are used by a |
| 10 | half decent number of ~arch users. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for June 11 | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |