1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
On 2021-03-08 20:01, Stephan Hartmann wrote: |
4 |
> Starting March 15th, 2021 Google Chrome Team will restrict access to |
5 |
> Google APIs and services that are reserved for Google use only. This |
6 |
> means that users are no longer able to login into their Google |
7 |
> Accounts which disables access to for example Chrome Sync. |
8 |
|
9 |
Maybe outline that this will only affect browser functions. You can |
10 |
still log in into your Google Account when accessing |
11 |
https://accounts.google.com/. |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
> As a consequence we have to remove Client ID and secret from all |
15 |
> www-client/chromium ebuilds. This change has already been done for |
16 |
> =www-client/chromium-89.0.4389.82. Other versions will be updated |
17 |
> shortly. |
18 |
|
19 |
My first reaction was: WTF?! Why remove... maybe add a reference to [2] |
20 |
already or quote |
21 |
|
22 |
> As explained in section above, signing in to Google web is rate |
23 |
> limited if the developer has configured a client ID and client |
24 |
> secret. To avoid hitting this limit in Chromium Derivatives, please |
25 |
> remove the OAuth 2.0 client ID and client secret from your build |
26 |
> configuration. |
27 |
|
28 |
directly in the news item. |
29 |
|
30 |
That said, I wonder if there's a use case to allow users to bake-in |
31 |
custom credentials. I know at least one large Gentoo setup distributing |
32 |
Firefox to its users with custom keys. This is possible via environment |
33 |
variables set at build time, see |
34 |
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/www-client/firefox/firefox-86.0.ebuild?id=dfe26277ee7441d00d88da14691cfc48db85ac8a#n453 |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
> If you need one of the Google use only APIs, then you either have to |
38 |
> switch to www-client/google-chrome{-beta,-unstable} or setup your |
39 |
> own keys [1]. |
40 |
|
41 |
Should be |
42 |
|
43 |
www-client/google-chrome{,-beta,-unstable} |
44 |
^^^ |
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
> However, the latter is only intended for development. Documentation |
48 |
> on how to generate and use own keys can be found in [2]. |
49 |
|
50 |
I wouldn't mention that at all. Either there is suitable way to keep |
51 |
status quo or there isn't. |
52 |
|
53 |
My suggestion: |
54 |
|
55 |
<Tell what's happening and maybe explain why or link to Google's |
56 |
announcement> |
57 |
|
58 |
<Tell consequences for Gentoo, i.e. ebuilds will no longer have set |
59 |
client_id or client_secret as explained in last paragraph of [2].> |
60 |
|
61 |
<Tell user if they have own ids/secrets that they can set them via |
62 |
environment variable at runtime (and or build-time if you are going to |
63 |
support that) or add reference to [2] again.> |
64 |
|
65 |
|
66 |
-- |
67 |
Regards, |
68 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
69 |
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |