| 1 |
On Friday, 20. October. 2006 04:46, Thomas Cort wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:21:21 -0400 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > This is your 1 week warning.. fix any packages which don't compile and |
| 6 |
> > ensure the fix is also in the stable tree. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> What package(s) are going stable in 1 week? I have no clue what you are |
| 9 |
> writing about since you didn't mention it in your e-mail. I did a |
| 10 |
> quick search and found the following 6 packages which have a version |
| 11 |
> 2.6.18: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> gentoo-sources-2.6.18 |
| 14 |
> linux-headers-2.6.18 |
| 15 |
> suspend2-sources-2.6.18 |
| 16 |
> usermode-sources-2.6.18 |
| 17 |
> vanilla-sources-2.6.18 |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> You also neglected to mention which architectures are going stable. Are |
| 20 |
> all arches going stable at the same time (in 1 week)? Will you still |
| 21 |
> go ahead with the stable marking if http://bugs.gentoo.org/148429 is |
| 22 |
> not resolved? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
IIRC, Daniel is talking about gentoo-sources (that's his main work area as you |
| 25 |
may know), vanilla-sources _and_ suspend2-sources will have to wait. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Furthermore, Daniel has allowance from x86 and amd64 arch teams to stable |
| 28 |
gentoo-sources on these archs. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> -Thomas |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Christian |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Christian Heim <phreak at gentoo.org> |
| 37 |
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6 |
| 38 |
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CAE3 556F 9A9F 68E6 |
Archives