| 1 |
W dniu wto, 23.01.2018 o godzinie 21∶44 +0100, użytkownik Thomas |
| 2 |
Deutschmann napisał: |
| 3 |
> Hi, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 2018-01-23 12:46, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > I've created a small HTML file with example of how this would look: |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/cc.html |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I've updated the example to include the variant suggested by Dirkjan. |
| 12 |
> > All arches are order according to the popularity (based on the results |
| 13 |
> > from his mail), except Prefix which I left at the bottom as a special |
| 14 |
> > case. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> grobian's variant doesn't work for me: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> When I start stabilization (especially for security bugs) I check |
| 19 |
> existing keywords via "ekeywords". For many packages I can select |
| 20 |
> "ALPHA" and scroll down to "Unstable arches", i.e. press and hold SHIFT |
| 21 |
> key and click "X86". Very easy. Grobian's variant would require to |
| 22 |
> deselect arm64 for example. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
If arm64 has stable keywords, you are expected to stabilize for it |
| 25 |
as well. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> djc's variant is better than grobian's variant, however I prefer a label |
| 29 |
> item like current "Unstable arches" which makes it easy for me to spot |
| 30 |
> the end of the typical list. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> In mgorny's variant I don't understand the differentiation between "exp" |
| 33 |
> and "~arch". I won't split them to be honest. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
'exp' are arches you are supposed to stabilize for but there are not |
| 36 |
first tier. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
'~arch' are arches you never stabilize for. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Best regards, |
| 42 |
Michał Górny |
Archives