1 |
Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> posted 44BDE23D.8090805@g.o, |
2 |
excerpted below, on Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:41:49 +0200: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hanno Böck wrote: |
5 |
>> Am Dienstag, 18. Juli 2006 14:06 schrieb Simon Stelling: |
6 |
>>> If nobody objects, I'd like to push that change through in two weeks. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> As most of then are "use ff instead of mozilla" and that'll be deprecated in |
9 |
>> favour of using ff by default and seamonkey by seamonkey useflag, I don't |
10 |
>> think this makes sense. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I can't follow, sorry. Sure, the new flag will be 'build against ff instead of |
13 |
> seamonkey', but then it's still valid use, no? |
14 |
|
15 |
I believe he meant that build against ff should be the default (where one |
16 |
or the other is required), thus need no USE flag. USE=seamonkey would be |
17 |
the alternative, where the alternative was formerly ff and the default |
18 |
mozilla (which then needed no USE flag). |
19 |
|
20 |
This however breaks down where neither one is required, in which case |
21 |
they'd both be optional and USE=firefox would remain a valid flag. He was |
22 |
making the case, tho (whether valid or not I don't know), that most of the |
23 |
current USE=firefox flags are where it was an alternate to a default |
24 |
mozilla as a required dep, and that if ff is to now be the default, the |
25 |
flag would no longer be needed in those cases, with the implication that a |
26 |
USE=seamonkey flag would be needed instead. |
27 |
|
28 |
That's how I read the message, anyway... of course assuming mine is any |
29 |
easier to parse. =8^) |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
33 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
34 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |