Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: mattst88@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 15:30:04
Message-Id: 20200512152957.GA8790@linux1.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass by Matt Turner
1 On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:47:23PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
2 > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
3 > >
4 > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
5 > > > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
6 > > > > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
7 > > >
8 > > > You can't commit this as long as there is a single such ebuild in the tree.
9 > >
10 > > Sure, and I'm working on migrating them.
11 >
12 > I think all the replies to this thread could have been avoided by just
13 > saying that in your initial email. :)
14
15 I didn't have a problem with what dilfridge said or even with the list
16 of points floppym came up with. My issue was more with the tone of
17 floppym's reply, and that has been resolved. :-)
18
19 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature