Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 05:47:42
Message-Id: CAEdQ38HWd+rbFpyDvYdWYVBgHCJXiNaqyCHuHB=o7a62nHCXJg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass by William Hubbs
1 On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
4 > > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
5 > > > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
6 > >
7 > > You can't commit this as long as there is a single such ebuild in the tree.
8 >
9 > Sure, and I'm working on migrating them.
10
11 I think all the replies to this thread could have been avoided by just
12 saying that in your initial email. :)

Replies