| 1 |
El lun, 23-07-2012 a las 15:08 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: |
| 2 |
> Il 23/07/2012 14:10, Peter Stuge ha scritto: |
| 3 |
> > Did anyone report it upstream? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Not me ... because I wouldn't know which one to care about. The problem |
| 6 |
> with upstream is that you have what they call master that is not really |
| 7 |
> stable, then what they call 'Release Engineering' that looks like a |
| 8 |
> kernel stable branch but they introduce new features there (instead of |
| 9 |
> master) first. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Then there is the concept that they don't really care about doing new |
| 12 |
> releases to fix build or run failures because they say that's what |
| 13 |
> integrators and distributors should be paid to deal with. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I agree with you, I'd rather run bird. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Will probably treeclean it in the next days if nobody is able to bump it |
| 19 |
and make it buildable then, as looks like bird can be a good replacement |
Archives