| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 11 May 2005 05:20 pm, Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>what we have: |
| 5 |
>>At the moment have_NPTL is defined in eclass/eutils.eclass, it compile a |
| 6 |
>>small test program to check if glibc have nptl support. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> hasnt this been outgrown ? people should `use nptl` now i think |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
in fact glibc has dropped support for linuxthreads on the trunk. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2005-05/msg00022.html |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
the only thing i know of that needs LT is Xen, and they're already |
| 15 |
working on NPTL support. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives