Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] have_NPTL proposal/question
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:32:59
Message-Id: 200505120833.10188.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] have_NPTL proposal/question by Francesco Riosa
1 On Wednesday 11 May 2005 05:20 pm, Francesco Riosa wrote:
2 > what we have:
3 > At the moment have_NPTL is defined in eclass/eutils.eclass, it compile a
4 > small test program to check if glibc have nptl support.
5
6 hasnt this been outgrown ? people should `use nptl` now i think
7
8 > there are drawbacks on the use of getconfig (that come with glibc) ?
9 > Maybe it's not supported from *libc ?
10
11 well i'd point out that glibc is the only libc atm to implement NPTL ... but
12 then i'd point out someone is working on it for uClibc ...
13 -mike
14 --
15 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] have_NPTL proposal/question Francesco Riosa <francesco@×××××××××.it>
[gentoo-dev] Re: have_NPTL proposal/question R Hill <dirtyepic@××××××××.org>