1 |
On Sunday 30 April 2006 03:55, Lance Albertson wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Here's an idea I had tonight. Since we're going to be doing the Google |
4 |
> SoC this summer, perhaps a great project would be having someone work |
5 |
> on this migration (or at least do an unbiased test implementation). I'd |
6 |
> be willing to provide an infra server for testing/development. I don't |
7 |
> see much problem at least trying to work out all the details. I don't |
8 |
> think infra will go with any change unless there is a clear, detailed |
9 |
> migration plan with proper back-out plans also. The tree is the most |
10 |
> important part of our distribution and I'm not going to let such a |
11 |
> migration go by without proper planning and testing. After the test |
12 |
> implementation is done and has been fully tested, perhaps the council |
13 |
> could make the final decision if infra is happy with the |
14 |
> implementation/migration details. |
15 |
|
16 |
I think that is a good idea. It's a perfect google SoC project as it has a |
17 |
clear boundary. Limited prerequisite knowledge is required, and it is |
18 |
something we would really benefit from. |
19 |
|
20 |
Paul |
21 |
|
22 |
ps. Perhaps the SoC project could include fixing up the migration tools |
23 |
(for example including the hypothesis that all ebuilds for a package |
24 |
descend from eachother) and other coding necessary to make things work |
25 |
perfectly. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Paul de Vrieze |
29 |
Gentoo Developer |
30 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
31 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |